This week saw the convergence of a few deadlines in financing and me going out of town. Landing in NYC, I realized I didn’t own a fax machine and I needed to sign some documents and fax them.
So out I go to the nearest Staples Express, plunk down $150 to buy a brand new Brother multifunction wonder, and then proceed to carry the huge box back to my apartment.
A few sweaty minutes later, I get to my place and set it up. I plug it all in and thankfully after a few tests, it all works fine.
I then sit down to print out a whole bunch of docs and prepare them for faxing to various places. What a big time suck. I need to sign two agreements and create fax cover sheets for both of them. I proceed to print out tons of paper and lay them out on my table and double check what they are and where they’re supposed to go. Finally I get that all organized and sign them, and then stuff them into my fax machine multiple times as many people need to have copies of them. I also create another fax for my financial person with wiring instructions, sign that, and then fax it away.
It seems as though the point at which all this is broken is the signature.
I can already email things around. I use Acrobat to generate PDFs all the time so I know that the docs won’t be altered. That’s not the problem.
The problem is when I need to physically sign something. Then I need to print something out, sign it, and then get back into an electronic state. This is typically a fax machine, but it can also mean scanning in of the doc and turning it into a PDF before emailing. Scanning this in can be problem. I have a Fujitsu ScanSnap seems to work most of the time, but if the paper is even slightly bent, it starts screwing up bulk scanning. Somehow, fax machines seem more resilient in feeding less than optimal paper, but I have to fax it somewhere. A buddy of mine told me to sign up for eFax which I finally am paying for now. It is about $170/year, but it definitely works great and now I have a fax number to boot. When faxes come in, I set it to convert to PDF so now I have electronic versions of all my faxes. I can also fax myself so that it essentially becomes a scanning->PDF solution.
But how can I insert my signature electronically? I suppose I could scan my signature into an image and then copy/paste it into documents. Security-wise, that isn’t too great; as soon as somebody gets hold of that image, I’m toast.
Where are all the digital signature solutions? I used to hear talk of companies attempting solutions but I don’t hear much about them now. A business opportunity perhaps, in the world of Web 2.0+?
Going paperless is key; it seems ridiculous that one of my most favorite appliances is my paper shredder. When we talk about legal documents, we’re talking about pages upon pages of formal wording that I have to go through and it sucks to carry it around, only to shred it when I’m done. Finally, I am starting to get used to reading these docs on the PC screen, although sometimes I find it still difficult (thank god for the ability to print 2 pages onto one piece of paper through MS Word). I have (almost) gotten my entire financial life to go paperless. Somehow, the world of signing agreements needs to get there as well.
Author Archives: dshen
If You Want to Have a Web 2.0 Company….
…you must use the right language in your presentations. Find useful and essential Web 2.0 doublespeak here at:
The Web 2.0 Bullshit Generator
After you finish your presentation, you must have an official Web 2.0 logo. Forget that retro crap. Go 2006 with a true Web 2.0 design! Type your company name here:
Web 2.0 Logo Creator
Since I want David Shen Ventures, LLC to be truly a next generation Web 2.0 company, I am thinking of switching my logo to this:
But if I truly want to be Web 2.0, I must drop some vowels. So…
I am also thinking of switching my page design. So I tried this automatic page layout creator for Web 2.0 design:
Web 2.0 Generator
Check out my proposed new webpage design.
Investor Experience and/or Attention to Detail
After doing this for about 4 months now and only really seeing maybe 5 investment term sheets, I am already seeing a huge variance in investor experience and/or attention to detail.
My lawyers are great. They are super-conservative and I joke to them about being worst-case-scenario guys. It is truly scary to hear all the crazy things that either have happened in the past or all the possible bad things that COULD happen. In their defense, that’s their job which is to protect their client and keep me out of trouble, and in the course of that scare the daylights out of me by talking about possible disaster scenarios.
It is obvious to me that not everyone is employing their lawyers in the same way. Or maybe their lawyers aren’t that good, or even stylistic differences in approaching financing changes the equation. Or maybe the company doesn’t want to spend the money to do things right. Or the investor either doesn’t want to spend legal fees or has no legal help at all.
In reviewing these term sheets, they range from being, “These investor terms are super-dangerous; I can’t believe anyone would sign this!” to “WOW these are great balanced terms that serve both the company and the investor”. I don’t see the ones which are (most likely) initially given to companies which are totally investor friendly and screws the company.
For some of the more experienced investors, I see definitely a jockeying of position for control happening in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. It is the interesting interplay between company and investor, and if you have large assets coming to the table, the company definitely wants to bring that cash in. But either side exhibits differing levels of experience. Generally, I find the big venture firms having more leverage and experience, but sometimes they seem to sign early stage docs a lot quicker and with less attention to detail since less money is involved. When bigger sums of money are involved, then the real jockeying begins as negotiation for rights and control are passed back and forth.
Still, as I ask around, I find that there are many of the big VC firms that also operate haphazardly. I do not know all the reasons behind this yet, but it seems that time is a big limiter, as is cost for applying legal fees, and also experience, especially among junior partners trying to get a deal done.
In some instances, given that it’s friends and family who are the angels, I think they operate on trust. They are relatives/friends of the entrepreneurs and give their support by putting up some of their own cash. They typically have little or no angel investing experience and probably not much legal help at all. So terms are not read or read and then not understood, and paperwork is signed on the assumption that the entrepreneur will not screw over their friends/family.
What can I say? I hate reading legal docs too. It’s why I asked my lawyer to really simplify my advisor agreement. You can actually read the damn thing if you’re not used to legalese, and understand what you’re getting if you sign me up. Before that, it was really tough to read; lots of legalese and weird words like “hereunder”. What the hell does “hereunder” mean? I see it everywhere in legal docs. Sheesh.
But I have forced myself to really read and understand term sheets and also the final expanded investing paperwork. As investors, I believe that we need to do this so that we can be prepared to defend why we’re asking for term changes, and to not be afraid to push for changes even though we’re not the lead investor. It is essential that we become experts in this and be good at reading docs, and not be shy about spending a bit on legal fees to keep us angel investors out of trouble.
Observations on the Startup World, August 2006
In the last few months in meeting entrepreneurs, I am finding many details that are interesting to me:
1. Office space is often somebody’s apartment or house. Many times it is also a dorm of sorts for their employees, and their living room is filled with desks and PCs. It is a nice way to save cash until they can get some to move to a real office space.
2. Meetings happen in cafes, or in the bedrooms of the “office” apartment! There must be some HR law that is violated if somebody of the opposite sex is interviewed behind closed doors in a bedroom…?
3. Entrepreneurs are at different levels of experience. Many I have met have started companies before. Many are first timers. What worries me is where they are getting their advice and education. I think some are not directing their education at all, but learning on the fly. A few have cash to work with their legal services to learn, which is kind of expensive.
4. Legal services are tough to pay for. It’s nice to hear some lawyers in the Valley are deferring payment until the company gets setup. But it also creates this climate of get it done fast and cheap and it could cut corners which cause problems later. One is in the area of investment terms. Often these terms will be cranked out and the entrepreneur doesn’t ask anymore questions for fear of creating billable hours; he just accepts them and takes them to naive investors. Typically these terms are company friendly only and naive investors take them without knowing the danger. It seems that even seasoned, large investors take the terms because they have lots of cash to play with, and bet on the team and the product. With them, they are used to losing cash on bad deals and factor that into their investment strategies.
5. Early investors are often friends and family and education level in angel investing is minimal. seems like many are operating on trust and don’t push back on the terms.
6. Everybody is at a different stage in funding. Some are pre-angel, some are in the middle of angel, some are post angel trying to get the big VC influx. It’s been interesting to get a handle on every company and where they are at.
7. Time is a big issue. I find that many are deluged by VCs clamoring for attention, companies that want to partner up, users who complain, etc. When the team is super small, you have to try to work on all that at once and it’s really tough. Many seemed overwhelmed.
More later on the wild and wooly world of entrepreneurs and startups…
What Do I Think is the Next Wave of Business for the Web?
When I tell people what I’m doing now, they always ask me about what I think is hot and upcoming. They always wonder what I think makes something worth looking into and potentially the next big hit in Web business. I guess they want to know the secret formula or something.
Sometimes I hate answering this question. It is almost like the question I always get asked in seminars when I present: What are your favorite websites and why? It seems that I always should have a ready answer in my pocket to give them. And sometimes it’s hard. Hard to remember all the websites I surf to each day, or those that I encounter through referrals or friends, or hard to articulate why I like something or why I don’t. So now I get into the practice of thinking more deeply about each website I go to and try to have some kind of answer to this question.
As I now must have for “What does Dshen think is hot on the Web and why?”
So I thought I’d write some of them down here so at least you can see what I’m thinking about these days:
1. I find the viralness and the spontaneous emergence of communities intriguing. Sometimes you can’t predict when something will take off. The non-prediction aspect is both frustrating and invigorating; as business minded folks, you want to be able to say that this community will work and I can make money of it or not. The reality is that a lot of these communities take off on their own. It has been shown to me that the “put it up and see what happens” strategy works so well here. If I don’t connect with a community or what brings it together, it doesn’t mean that it won’t be huge or work for others. Which brings me to my next thought…
2. It’s all about the niches. The Yahoos and the Googles of the world have already taken care of the broad swaths of internet turf. But they are so huge that it’s hard and not justifiable to attack niches. This is where I think smaller companies can do a great job at tackling niche markets and flourishing. With the internet lowering barriers of reaching people, small niches that were hampered by geography and other factors can all of sudden congregate and be powerful through the internet, which has no physical limitations. So communities of interest can form and be really huge.
3. In the future, the power will really be spread out to the people. I really like startups working on concepts which empower people. One big example is how MySpace is showing that the record labels aren’t as necessary as they were years ago when there was no internet. Musicians can now effectively get their music out to the masses and make money without the marketing power of record labels. If the labels (and music studios, and other similar huge old world entities) don’t change their thinking, they will all die a slow death. Throwing lawsuits at it will slow it down but my belief is that such movement of democratizing the old world is unstoppable and inevitable.
4. Equally important and relevant to me are the people working on it. I find there are two types of people. Those who are very open minded and those who are not. My belief is that the open minded people are more creative, more adaptable, and be able to accept new ideas and directions than those who are not. I try to avoid working with those who think their way is the only way and don’t really listen to what I have to say, or what others have to say for that matter. In my 10+ years of working on Web products, I have been surprised so many times at what works and what doesn’t that I’ve lost count. You have to have the ability to go with the flow and shift and adapt. Being too rigid brings a lot of risk, which brings me to the next point…
5. I see building applications on the Web has a huge probability game. Nobody is guaranteed for success but yet that shouldn’t stop you from putting something up and seeing what happens. And whatever you do, you keep stacking the odds in your favor. You keep testing and adjusting. You find smart people to bring onto your team. You network continuously to make sure you get the best ideas possible. Keep stacking the odds in your favor and you may just find that someone who isn’t doing this is all of sudden left in the dust.
6. A buzzword favorite. I like companies who work in the long tail (see book of same name The Long Tail by Chris Anderson) which is akin to giving the power to the people.
7. Another buzzword favorite. I like companies who disrupt old traditional ways of doing things. Those who take on big, huge, slow companies in big and huge industries by doing something in a different way that cuts costs and delivers better to their customers. Love it. Think iTunes to the music and TV industries.
Other stuff: Gotta be innovative, gotta be engaged with the Web. Being tenacious and never giving up. Unwavering belief in success.
That’s it. Now to work on my favorite websites list haha.
Flightstats.com, NYTimes Article, Preparing for the Onslaught
Today I saw an article in the New York Times online edition about flightstats.com. This site is pretty cool. It gives you tons of information about the flights out of any airport, and any associated delays. The article also talks about the myriad of delays plaguing all airports during the summer travel season and highlights how annoying travel can be with late arriving, delayed, and cancelled flights. Flightstats.com helps with all that by giving you the latest info on any flight in or out of any airport in the world.
Of course upon reading the article, and being an avid world traveler, I immediately went to the site to check it out. I entered the URL and….waited….and waited….and waited….
I went to the bathroom and came back and it still had not pulled up.
It brought me back to a time when the team that designed the ads for the front page of Yahoo! used to report to me. We would deal with many clients and every time we talked to them we would ask them if they were technically ready to handle the traffic that exposure on the Yahoo! front page would bring.
The answer we would receive would always be an emphatic yes. But we would never believe them.
We would reply with an “are you sure?” and a “we’re going to test your site to make sure it’s ok” and a proposal to host a jump page which would look exactly like the target page but only be put up in case of emergencies.
Sometimes they would take our offer and sometimes they would not. Foolish mortals.
In the years that I helped out with Yahoo! front page ads, I think at least 8 out of 10 clients were technically not ready to handle traffic that the Yahoo! front page would deliver them. It was the equivalent of a firehosing of users to the site, and webmasters on the client end would almost never be ready to handle it. We’ve seen site slow-downs to virtual non-response conditions whereby too many users would attempt to enter the client’s site. People outside of the Yahoo’s of the world just didn’t have the experience to handle that much traffic, and under normal operating conditions, never need to even deal with that.
But buying an ad on the Yahoo! front page isn’t a normal condition.
In recent years, I have seen this gotten better. People seem to be doing better at building scalable solutions and being prepared for them.
I guess not everyone has experienced it yet.
Today, an article in Wired, a plug on the Today show, or a discussion in the New York Times is enough to send a ton of users your way. Obviously, Flightstats.com wasn’t prepared for it. I went there and waited and waited for many minutes before the site came up. Then it was butt slow trying to retrieve data on LAX for today.
It just goes to show that building scalable web products is a necessary skill, and that even abnormal exposure in a news article is enough to make your site slow down or even stop responding.
Only Designers Would Chuckle
Traditional logos redesigned in Web 2.0 style!
Yay Hooray | yh collab: redesign famous logos in web 2.0 format!
Maybe I’m weird, but I think this is hilarious!
Networking and Keeping in Touch
Ever since I left Yahoo! 2 years ago, I’ve been asked numerous times about how I keep in touch with people post-Yahoo!. I would come back from a trip to LA or Europe or NYC and talk to people about how I saw this person or that person, and they would be amazed that I still knew them or was able to keep in touch with them over time and distance outside of our common factor, which would be our job at Yahoo!.
Keeping in Touch is Full-time Job…Sort of
It sometimes feels like a full time job, juggling contacts, and managing my calendar weeks in advance. It would even be nice to have an admin deal with all this! But as much time and effort as it can take, I don’t look at it as a job either. I know some people do, and there are “professional networkers” who do a lot of networking mostly for job related reasons. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but I just think there is something deeper that we can enjoy about networking.
The Time Factor
Most people live in the here and now. You try to get them to nail down time in advance and it’s impossible. I have known people in the past who refused to hold a time with you in case SOMETHING BETTER SHOWS UP. How does that make you feel? Are you the most important thing in their lives?
In my role as world traveller, I have come to live by my calendar and strive for 100% compliance with it. I try to schedule things with people weeks in advance with people, since my travel calendar is already set for the next few months. I also try to remember when people want to get together with me so that I contact them later to catch up.
Sometimes I screw up though. I have missed meetings due to the complexity of my calendar and I really hate that. It doesn’t make me feel very efficient and I do my best to fill in the calendar immediately after setting something up.
Scheduling travel time is also a challenge. Knowing how long it takes to get from one place to another can be really tough. That’s another thing I hate: BEING LATE.
Time is valuable to everyone. I don’t like to waste other peoples’ time.
The Connection
I’ve read some books on networking for business. Sometimes I think they miss an essential human component to networking, which is the ability to connect with other human beings at a more deeper level than just for business.
I think people see right through you when you network for business. Your mannerisms, what you talk about, everything – it all says, “we should stay in touch because it may benefit us business-wise.” It never says, “Hey what a cool person – I enjoy just shooting the breeze here and it takes a load off to catch up.” In the past, I’ve had people network with me like that. I don’t think there is necessarily anything wrong with that, but I think it could be much more.
Connecting with people on a deeper level is a skill. It shows your willingness to trust, to communicate, to share, to give and receive. It speaks to you opening up as an interesting human being rather than just looking for another business contact. I believe you can learn to do this, as I have had that experience just recently over the last few years. But I also see how some people have never learned that skill and seem to be unable to even get there. It’s really too bad.
I also believe it’s the real secret to keeping in touch with people in the long run. Why would you continually keep in touch with people who you really don’t care all that much about except to get something out of them?
You naturally want to hang out with people you like, and that you can CONNECT with.
Connection starts at the beginning. In my experience, sometimes you get it or you don’t. Sometimes it’s natural and sometimes it just doesn’t work. I don’t think it can be forced. But even within that, there is a wide grey area between the “natural connection” and the “there won’t be any connection at all now or in the future”. In general, first impressions can mean a lot so I would definitely put your best forward as early as possible. Otherwise, natural connections can be severed whereby they could have developed. I also believe that there are some people you just won’t connect with at all, and sometimes you just have to live with that and move on.
No matter what, connecting with someone makes the relationship that much more satisfying and incents you to connect more.
Value Given, Value Received
It almost pains me to talk about giving and receiving value in networking. It makes it sound so unnatural. Certainly in our society, we value connections at the human level and the giving and receiving of non-physical things like love and help and respect. We don’t hold in such high regard expections of physical or monetary gifts.
But I don’t think I could talk about networking without talking about what I get out of it.
So satisfaction and enjoyment from connecting with others is one great benefit we’ve talked about.
One value I like to receive is for the effort I put into trying to meet with people, over time I’d like to see it come back my way. It takes a lot of effort to schedule things, drive around and meet people, catch up and conversate, etc. At some point, sometimes it becomes more one way. I find that I am the one that constantly pursues meetings. I call or send out emails and sometimes I get no response. The best ones I get back are the “YES WHEN ARE WE MEETING?” emails or the energetic “THAT NIGHT WORKS LOOKING FORWARD TO IT” replies. It really makes me feel good to see/feel/hear that others are just as enthusiastic to meet up with me as I am to meet with them.
If I don’t get that back, over time I am less likely continue pursuing meeting up with that person. You know, life changes. People change. People get married and have other more important things occupying their time. Or they just stink as networkers and as connectors of people. It’s just the way of the world. However, the ones to really cherish are the ones that continually give you value as much as you give them value when you meet. They enjoy your company beyond just being a great business contact.
Networking in the Digital Age
Truly it’s easier now to keep in touch with people than before. In the old days, you’d have to use the phone. Now the digital age has made it so much easier to keep in touch and find people in your past.
My favorites:
1. Sending out that random email to someone I haven’t talked to in a while. Certainly email is the method of choice for non-real time scheduling of meetings and communication.
2. Trolling Yahoo! 360 or Linked-In for old acquaintances. Yahoo! 360 has been particularly good because of all the people I have known over the years at Yahoo!. Friendster sometimes works, but I’m not on it that often. Social networking sites are great for this kind of stuff.
3. Instant messaging works great! While working at Yahoo!, all my old colleagues were my Yahoo! Messenger friends. I just didn’t delete them when they left, so occasionally I’ll ping them to see what’s up.
4. My blog has been an unexpected source of connection with old acquaintances. I am constantly amazed by who reads my blog. Every now and then I’ll meet up with someone and they’ll say they’ve been following my exploits on my blog for months. Amazing! Makes me want to keep blogging!
Bottom Line
Networking takes time and effort. Connect with those you network with, when you can. Make networking fun and enjoyable rather than just another thing to do for work. Remember always that networking can lead to friendships and other rewarding relationships as well. It works the other way too, where friendships can lead to meeting more interesting people, valuable personally and professionally.
Relationships are natural and necessary for human beings so make the time and energy to meet and keep in touch.
Where Have All the White Headphones Gone?
About 2 years ago, I was on assignment for about 6 months in Europe. I was in London mostly, and there every other week, in addition to staying there for 5 weeks straight. It was a great experience as you never really know what’s like in a foreign country, unless you live there day to day for a while, go grocery shopping, walk the streets, and really be like someone who lives there.
So 2 years ago was early 2004. It was around the time the iPod was really taking off, and I was amazed at all the trademark white headphones I saw on the streets as people walked to work. I remember thinking about what a great branding design it was, to see all these white headphones everywhere. You knew immediately that this person had an iPod. No other MP3 players had such a distinctive headphone color. I also remember thinking about how dominant the iPod was in the market of digital music players and here was visible proof that the iPod was very popular amongst the masses.
Fast forward to summer 2006. I am walking the streets again of London. This time I am amazed at the lack of visible white headphones among the people. Truly the density of white headphones has dropped considerably. What happened?
Market reports show iPod sales are still strong, but then I remember reading an article that talked about the sheer number of competitive products out there, which was numbering in the 100s. It seems as though this had made a dent in MP3 players as other products came into grab some market share and Londoners had purchased other brands of players, as the number of headphones I saw was still high, but just not the usual signature white iPod headphones I saw 2 years ago.
It’s hard to retain market share when new products have entered the space. Apple has competed on design successfully with the iPod and its associated coolness with owning one, but when there are equally cool but different looking products out there, it’s tough to keep it up. As a designer, I shudder to think about the time when design itself can become commoditized in a particular category. When this happens, you need to start designing more personal products, those that target the individual and what makes him/her cool and not just an overall coolness about being associated with brand like Apple.
It will be interesting to see if the coolness of owning an iPod will continue into the future, and if Apple can keep producing the magic which makes consumers desire their products.
David Shen Ventures, LLC: Spread the Knowledge
I just started a company with which I will attempt to involve myself in startups. For simplicity, I have dubbed it David Shen Ventures, LLC.
Through advisorships with companies, I can give them the benefit of my 9 years of Yahoo! experience in creating businesses on the Internet. I meld that with my experience in design and believe that I can increase a company’s chance of success.
But one thing I’ve noticed being out here in the world for 2 years after Yahoo! – even after the Internet being around for about 11 years or so now, the broadness of knowledge still has not made it out of the walls of Yahoo! or Google. If you think about it, not many people have really left those companies until just recently. As a result, most of the companies don’t get the exposure to the breadth and depth of thought that occurs within those companies. I’ve always said that the most junior of employees at Yahoo! has still more knowledge about Internet products than the most experienced of another company. It has nothing to do with intelligence; smart people are everywhere. It has everything to do with experience and exposure to lines of thinking that you would never had seen unless you worked at a Google or Yahoo!.
As I get David Shen Ventures, LLC into operation, I find that there is a real desire of startups to learn the secrets of Yahoo! or Google. My hope is that I can truly add value to these companies, and to the industry in general, by exposing them to the thinking and experience that I had 9 years of immersion in.
I want to spread the knowledge. I want to share the wealth of the wisdom.
It’s been a positive thing for me; already I have 12 companies wanting me to join them. So much hunger for Yahoo! know-how…